What bothers me about the film is that I'm intrigued with it as close representation of what really happened. Granted it gets points for provoking a reaction of horror and disgust, but at the same time it shouldn't be coupled with the question "Why are you watching this then?". On some level I feel that the director's desire to do something with the story clashed with budget concerns and a need to make an exploitive film that would return its cost and so they ended up with a film thats neither socially relevant nor good exploitation. The only one you really feel for is Maggie, but even then you grow weary waiting for the inevitable. The trouble is that the script is a meandering mess going from unpleasant person to unpleasant situation.We get to see more than we ever wanted about the lives of everyone involved. With in its limited budget its not a bad looking film which adds to the nastiness. Its low budget adds a grittiness to to it. The killers then dispose of the body in the title manner. It all ends after she steals some money and she's brutalized to the point of death. (This is based on a true story and parts of the woman really were found in the Hello Kitty doll.) What we find out is that the victim was a girl who made a wrong turn and life and the downward spiral lead to prostitution and worse. Exceptions to this rule may be made at the discretion of the subreddit.Told in mostly in flashback this film is about the police investigation into the remains that are found in an apartment, and more to the point a Hello Kitty Mermaid which has been optically censored out of the film because Sanrio was unhappy.
Content that combines multiple sources as well as original research and focuses on one topic in order to provide a concentrated source of meaningful information is an exception to this rule, but may still violate rule five depending on how it is disseminated. This type of content includes (but is not limited to) "top ten" lists and videos, or "reddit videos" (such as that which SootHouse produces). No rehashed or aggregated content Media that simply collects publicly available content (or content from this subreddit) in to one place, typically for the purposes of collecting ad revenue is absolutely not welcome. Promotional content is not permitted without prior approval if you have a YouTube channel, sell a book, make films, or operate any other sort of venture, any post or comment directing traffic directly or indirectly to such a venture is prohibited unless you have been expressly permitted to do so by the moderators of this subreddit. Whether such a ban will be lifted is subject to behavior and will be determined on a case-by-case basis.īe civil Incivility in comments will not be tolerated, and comments that violate this rule will be removed. Commenters exhibiting this behavior will be given a single warning, and banned upon the second infraction. incivility toward any particular group of people) of any kind will - generally speaking - not be tolerated. Hate speech will not be tolerated Hate speech (e.g. not flushed).ĭo not use sensational or misleading titles or post sensationalized content The exception to this rule is Wikipedia articles that may refer to reputed or non-factual information that have been generally accepted by the Wikipedia community (e.g. If you are a creator posting a compilation article or video, your submission may be removed if it contains so much as one item in violation of this rule. paranormal) - has citations and evidence in its favor. Posted articles should (generally speaking) be matters of fact While more than just Wikipedia articles are accepted, your submissions should consist strictly of factual information, or information that - if it has not been accepted as fact (e.g.
0 kommentar(er)
